| 
POLITICS AND RELIGION, GOOD AND EVIL IN THE WORLD TODAY
When I look back on twenty years of political activism in the USA 
and more recently in Donbass, I must admit I sometimes wonder if it was 
worth it. I ask myself if I have actually done any good. "Good", both in
 the moral sense and as well as whether I've been effective. Whether 
I've done my share, made any actual difference. We all have a part to 
play, something that we can do. The question is whether we do what we 
can, or don't. Einstein said that the answers to all the world's 
problems lie in the space between what people do and what they could do,
 if they chose to, if they made the effort, took action instead of just 
talking about the world's problems, or worse, ignoring them.
But
 of course, if you take the responsibility, the risk, of taking action, 
you must be sure it is for the right cause. This brings up the question 
of good and evil. You have to know what they are to know which side 
you're on.  So, let's start by defining both "Good" and "Evil", as 
moral, philosophic and materialistic concepts. Should we start with Good
 or Evil? As Anton Chigurh might say, "Let's flip for it." I did. It came up tails. Evil.
Many
 people say that money is the root of all evil. They are ignorant, (and 
we'll get to that) aping the words of others, clueless as to the real 
quote, where it came from, or what it really means. The real quote is 
from the Bible, First Timothy 6:10, and it says "The love of money
 is the root of all evil", and that is what it means. Big difference.  
So, how is the love of money expressed? Through greed and selfishness of
 course, and greed and selfishness are also symptoms of fear. 
Scott Peck, the brilliant psychiatrist and theologian, wrote a book, 
People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil, in which he 
gave several excellent definitions of what evil really is. The first and
 most concise is simply "militant ignorance". Think about that for a 
moment, let it sink in. And ask yourself if there is a better, more all 
encompassing description than that for the USA in the 21st Century.  It 
is the definition of evil. There are other definitions and  indices of 
evil in his book, all of which are instructive. The title itself defines
 evil - "The People of the Lie". Is there a representative of the US 
government over the last 30 years for whom this title does not apply? 
The Bible, in John 8:44 describes the Devil, saying, "When he lies, he 
speaks his native language, for he is a liar, and the father of lies." 
Peck further defines evil as "a willingness to impose suffering on 
others, in order to avoid one's own spiritual growth." Again hauntingly 
familiar, a definition I am sure that the millions of suffering victims 
of the USA's 21st Century wars of aggression would readily agree with.
The
 modern history of the USA is one big lie. From the Warren Commission to
 9/11, from Iraqi WMD's to Syrian chemical weapons, lies are the 
currency of the US government. And the worst kind of lies are 
self-deception, which allows people to continue to do evil, while 
pretending to themselves that they are good. The murder of Gaddafi and 
the destruction of Libya, under the excuse of Right-to-Protect ("R2P") 
is a perfect example. The "protection" that the US and NATO provided to 
Libya has led directly to an estimated minimum
 of 150,000 people in Libya, and a potential maximum of 360,000, with 
the mean average estimated at 250,000 people "protected" to death in 
Libya in the last 8 years. Under self righteous but demonstrably false 
premises. The same false premises have cost the lives of 2.4 million 
people in Iraq (NOT counting the 500,000 children killed by sanctions 
before the  2003 invasion, which Madeline Albright said were "worth it".)  Over a million are estimated to have been killed by
 US/NATO in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and the death toll of the US 
instigated civil war against the legitimate government of Syria is estimated at 511,000
 as of March 2018, and the toll continues to climb. These illegitimate 
wars of aggression, started by the USA and their lackey have killed over
 4 million human beings in less than a decade, and these war continue 
today, based on the same lies with which they were started. The people 
of the lie, indeed...
So, let's begin our definition of evil 
by agreeing that those who commit, facilitate, allow or ignore the 
murder of millions of human beings is genuinely evil.
Hannah
 Arendt's book, Eichmann in Jerusalem : A Report on the Banality of 
Evil, also offers useful definitions and insights into what evil really 
is. She came away from Eichmann's trial struck by the banality, the 
stupidity, the utterly unremarkable and unoriginal character of a man 
who was also a willing functionary in a regime that was guilty in the 
mass murder of millions of people whose only "crime" was allowing 
themselves to be victims.  We can see the same banality in Donald Trump 
and Hillary Clinton, in Boris Johnson and Teresa May, in Petro 
Poroshenko and Benjamin Netanyahu. Their pseudo intellect and their 
pseudo humanity. Another telltale sign of evil is cowardice - most of 
the leading German nazis chose suicide, and even murdered their entire 
families, rather than face justice and try to justify to the world what 
they were and what they had done. Or perhaps,it would be better to say 
that evil is a symptom of fear. It is, after all, far more difficult to 
be good than to be evil, especially in the world today, though perhaps 
it has always been thus.
Greed and stinginess 
are also symptoms of fear, and the ultimate goal of Capitalism can 
honestly be described in the vile maxim "All for me, and none for 
anybody else." In the USA today, the ultimate perversion of true 
Christianity is practiced by millions of affluent citizens under the 
contemptible name of "Prosperity Gospel". They say that they are rich 
because they are rewarded by God for being good, and poor people are 
poor because they are punished by God for their evil ways. This, of 
course, is the exact opposite of the true Gospel of Jesus, such as 
Matthew 19:24, "
Indeed, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle 
than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."  And Matthew 1:29, "
"If you want to be perfect, go sell everything you own! Give the money 
to the poor, and you will have riches in heaven."   When it comes to 
riches, it was the Devil who "took Jesus on a very high mountain and 
showed him all the kingdoms of the Earth, and all their riches, and 
said, "All this I will give to you if you will but fall down and worship
 me." Matthew 4:8. Among the venal scum who preach this false religion, 
giving to the poor is not a priority. They live in multi-million dollar 
mansions, own private jets and luxury cars and build "mega-churches" the
 size of sports stadiums, as opulent as any Roman colosseum.
 "Pastrix" Paula White even gave multi-millionaire ($147 million) 
"Bishop" T. D. Jakes a $200,000 Bentley convertible for his 50th 
birthday. The top 10 richest "pastors"
 in the world live in the USA, or Nigeria. These scum spend millions on 
their own obscenely extravagant lifestyles, while giving a tiny fraction
 of their proceeds to the poor. They are paid by the Devil that they 
worship.
Bono's
 ONE Foundation is another glaring example - Though his own net worth is
 close to $700 million, he started the ONE Foundation to "raise 
awareness" of extreme poverty in Africa and elsewhere. The foundation 
raised over $11 million in 2008, and gave less than 2% to actual programs to help the poor. The rest went to the already 
obscenely rich Bono and his yuppie underlings.  Of course, 
centi-millionaire Bono's fraud is chump change compared to the Clinton 
Foundation, "a charity fraud of epic proportions".   The Clinton Foundation
 entities are part of a network that has defrauded donors and created 
illegal private gains of approximately $100 billion in combined 
magnitude, and possibly more, since 23 October 1997."  Remember the quote about the love of money? It is the root of all evil. These phony preachers, these fake progressives, they love their money, are willing to steal food from starving children to buy their mansions and private jets, these
паразиты, these parasites, are truly evil.
There
 is an old canard, sometimes taught in 3rd rate ethics or philosophy 
classes that asks, "Is it wrong for a man to steal medicine for his 
dying wife if he cannot afford to buy it?"  What a ridiculous question. 
The answer is so obvious to any decent human being - "No, it is wrong 
for there to be medicine that is unaffordable to people who need it."  
So, what is "good"? 
As
 a Communist, my interpretation of what is right and good is that which 
is the greatest good for the greatest number of people, and by "good", I
 mean that which promotes the health and happiness, that which ensures 
the basic necessities of life and the opportunity for each individual to
 fulfill their human potential to the greatest degree. As I see it, to 
the extent that someone's actions diminish or interfere with this, they 
cannot be good. To the extent that they impose unnecessary suffering on 
others, they are evil. Every billionaire on this planet is evil. Their love of money has led them to amass unearned and unjustifiable fortunes without any consideration of others. No one can earn
 a billion dollars. That amount can only be stolen or swindled. No one 
can work so hard or be so brilliant that they could possibly earn such a
 sum. And it must be understood and remembered that a billion is one 
thousand million, and most billionaires are multi-billionaires, they 
have multi thousand millions. And yet children on this planet still 
starve, millions live without even the most basic requirements of life. 
There can be no moral justification for this.
Other
 than a belief in God and an afterlife to be determined by what we do in
 this one, the broader definition of "religion" is a belief in something
 greater than one's self, and a moral code that reflects that belief. I 
am an Orthodox Christian, and I do believe in God and an afterlife, but 
whether God exists or whether there is life after this one or not, 
either way, the definition of "good" remains the same. "The greatest 
good for the greatest number of people."  Certainly, this would be the 
right way to earn the approval of God and a good place in the afterlife,
 but even if this life is all we have, we should still work for the same
 goal - we must make it as good and fulfilling as possible for ourselves
 and for all who share this short cosmic miracle of life with us. After 
all, we are all in this together. So, religion is the moral code by 
which we judge good and evil, ourselves and others, and politics is the 
method we use to realize our ideals. Thus politics and religion are 
inextricably intertwined.
Von
 Clauswitz famously said, "War is not an independent phenomenon, it is 
the continuation of politics carried out by different means." So, if war
 is politics carried out by different means, then politics is war 
carried out by different means. And make no mistake, our world is at 
war, the final war, Armageddon, the final conflict between good and 
evil, life and death. This war has the very real potential to annihilate
 not only all human life but also the very biosphere, all complex life 
on our planet. We are here, now, to choose our side and do our part in 
this war. We all have a part to play, and we all choose our side. 
Neutrality is not an option. Indifference is not an option. Evil is 
winning, death is winning, and all those who do nothing are on that 
side. 
The
 open warfare in Donbass and Syria are only the most obvious flashpoints
 in this global war between good and evil, life and death. And every 
choice we make, our every act or failure to act, effects this war and 
its ultimate outcome. Unless we can drastically change the current 
trajectory of human activity, we ourselves may not see the end of 
Humanity, but our children will. Life is what we make it, what all of us
 together make it for all of us together. Evil is powerful, but it is 
small, and it is afraid. We can defeat it, if we choose correctly our 
own moral code and then live by it in real terms, come what may, if we 
cross that space between what we do and what we could do, we can find 
the answers to all the world's problems.
Let's go!